Understanding Asynchronous Javascript
Published on June 30, 2019 1392 WordsThe most common issue I’ve seen beginners face when learning Javascript is its asynchronous nature. Understandably of course, as it’s considerably different from writing fully synchronous code, which is what is usually taught first. My goal with this article is to provide a comprehensible and easily approachable explanation for newcomers to Javascript or asynchronous programming in general.
Take the following sample:
const add = (a, b) => {
return a + b;
};
const result = add(20, 10);
return result;
In it, the interpreter does the following:
- Define a constant named `add` that holds an arrow function
- Define a constant named `result` that holds the return value of `add(20, 10)`
- Return the value of the constant `result`
As you already know, that means the code runs in the order it’s read, from top to bottom and left to right. This is very useful for simple programs because it keeps the code clean, concise and easy to follow, but such approach poses problems for more complex projects.
For example, say you have a file called notes.txt
and you want to read and
count how many notes it has. Assuming the file has one note per line, we can
achieve this goal like so:
const fs = require("fs"); // Load the `fs` module.
// It is responsible for interacting with the filesystem
const fileLocation = "notes.txt";
const fileData = fs.readFileSync(fileLocation); // Read our file into memory
const notes = fileData.split("\n"); // Split our file by the newline character
console.log(`You have ${notes.length} notes`); // Finally, log the result
Great! This example works perfectly, but it’s not very elegant. If we’re processing a large file, this operation could take a relatively long time and confuse the end user, since the process will completely freeze until the file is read. A common way of adressing this issue is with loading spinners, but due to Javascript’s single-threaded nature that’s not possible, as it would require running code simultaneously… right?
What is asynchronous?
Asynchronous code is simply some piece of code that doesn’t necessarily run at the same time as another. This is useful in our example because it means we can run the code for our loading spinner while the file is being processed. Crazy, right? Here’s how I would do it, using the cli-spinner library for simplicity:
// Load the `fs` module.
// It is responsible for interacting with the filesystem
const fs = require("fs");
const Spinner = require("cli-spinner").Spinner;
const fileLocation = "notes.txt";
const spinner = new Spinner("Processing...");
// Define the function we want to be
// run when the file is done being read
const done = (error, fileData) => {
if (error) {
console.error(`ERROR: ${error}`);
return;
}
// Split our file by the newline character
const notes = fileData.split("\n");
// Stop the spinner
spinner.stop();
// Finally, log the result
console.log(`You have ${notes.length} notes`);
}
// Read the file, and pass a reference to our function
// to be run once the file is done reading
fs.readFile(fileLocation, done);
// Start our spinner
spinner.start();
Note how we don’t manipulate the data instantly. The fs.readFile
function
expects a reference to a function as the second parameter, which is then called
when the data we need is ready. In the meantime, however, the node process is free
to do whatever else it wants (in this case, show our little spinner). This is
called a callback, and for the longest time it was the de facto way of doing
asynchronous programming in Javascript. But such approach is not perfect.
The problem with callbacks
Expanding our example, say that in addition to displaying how many notes the
user has, we also want to display how big the file is. To do so, we use the
fs.stat
function, and like with fs.readFile
, we also need to use callbacks.
Since we want to display that information after we read the file, we must
register our new callback in the done
function, like so:
// Define the function we want to be
// run when the file is done being read
const done = (error, fileData) => {
if (error) {
console.error(`ERROR: ${error}`);
return;
}
// Split our file by the newline character
const notes = fileData.split("\n");
// Stop the spinner
spinner.stop();
// Finally, log the result
console.log(`You have ${notes.length} notes`);
fs.stat(fileLocation, (err, fileInformation) => {
if (err) {
console.error(`ERROR: ${err}`);
return;
}
console.log(`Your file has ${fileInformation.size} bytes of information`);
});
}
Instead of defining a second function for this, we use an inline arrow function for convenience. As you can see, this introduces a couple problems, both of which get progressively worse the more callbacks we need to chain together:
- One more level of nesting, making our code hard to read
- We need to come up with new names for our callback parameters, as the previous variables are still in scope.
We can work around these issues by making each callback it’s own top-level function, but that is cumbersome for simple operations like this. With these issues in mind, the community came up with Promises, which aim to provide more flexibility and reduce nesting when working with asynchronous Javascript.
Promises
Promises not only offer a cleaner way of chaining asynchronous operations, but by nature also allow you to do all sorts of cool things like running multiple asynchronous operations in parallel or even “racing” promises, where only the first to complete is used.
Here’s how our example looks when using promises instead of callbacks:
// Load the `fs` module.
// It is responsible for interacting with the filesystem
const fs = require("fs").promises;
const Spinner = require("cli-spinner").Spinner;
const fileLocation = "notes.txt";
const spinner = new Spinner("Processing...");
// Read the file
fs.readFile(fileLocation)
.then((data) => {
// Split our file by the newline character
const notes = fileData.split("\n");
// Finally, log the result
console.log(`You have ${notes.length} notes`);
// We are done with our first promise, so we can return another one
// Since fs.stat returns a promise, we can conveniently return it
return fs.stat(fileLocation);
})
.then((data) => {
// Here `data` refers to the data returned by `fs.stat`
console.log(`Your file has ${fileInformation.size} bytes of information`);
// Stop our spinner
spinner.stop();
})
.catch((error) => {
console.error(`ERROR: ${error}`);
});
spinner.start();
Even if you don’t yet understand how that works, you can see how the code looks a lot cleaner. To start using promises, you need to understand a couple of things.
A promise is an object like any other. While it can vary by implementation, you can assume every promise has at least these two methods:
-
.then()
:: Takes a function as the first argument to be run when the promise resolves (completes). Basically your way of saying “do this, then that” -
.catch()
:: Like.then()
, takes a function as the first argument to be run when the promise rejects (errors). It is important to always catch (handle) promise rejections, even if you just log them somewhere. If you don’t, you’ll get a warning in the console and in the future a crash in your application.
With that in mind, the usual workflow when working with promises is:
- Call a function that returns a promise (in this case,
fs.readFile
) - Call
.then()
on the returned promise with a callback for what we want to do with the data - If chaining, call another function that returns a promise and return it. This can be done indefinitely, of course.
- Call
.catch()
to handle whatever errors our promise chain can potentially throw.
This is the most basic overview of how asynchronous operations work in
Javascript. There’s a lot more to cover, like async/await
and Promise.all()
,
but this should be enough to get you started. If you have any questions, refer
to the FAQ and feel free to post a comment if that doesn’t help or if you
believe this article can be improved.
FAQ
-
Q: Can I get data out of a callback / promise?
A: No. Since callbacks / promises run at some indeterminate time in the future, trying to do so will lead you to all sorts of weird bugs that are hard to trace back. Usually you should treat data that’s inside a callback / function as 100% limited to that scope, that way you can avoid these problems altogether.
-
Q: Can I wait for a promise to complete before doing something else?
A: No. If you want to run an operation after a promise resolves, you must do it inside the callback of
.then()
.